Well, most of the news this past week has been saturated (pardon the pun) with news of Hurricane Irene. We must therefore include it in today's Sunday Summary.
Oddly enough, what is most historical about Irene is the damage that it didn't cause. By the time its first landfall in North Carolina, it had already lost much of its steam, and had been downgraded to a category 1 hurricane. By the time it hit New York, it was merely a tropical storm. Yet, in New York, the subway was completely shut down, and hundreds of thousands in the low-lying areas of New York were ordered, ordered by Mayor Michael Bloomberg to evacuate. Yet, of the roughly 370,000 people ordered to evacuate, it is estemated that only 37,000 people complied.
To be sure, Irene did cause some damage, though in dollar terms, it's still being calculated. As of this writing, 15 people are known to have died as a direct result of the hurricane, either from falling trees or floodwaters. And many are still in the dark, after power outages affected more than 4 million people on the eastern seaboard. Moreover, the deluge of rainfail inland of the coast still needs to drain, which still threatens the water level of the rivers that drain it back into the ocean.
However, the damage is rather minimal in comparison to what Irene was anticipated to cause, and so she was, on the whole, more hype than hurricane. Without minimizing the loss of those 15 who died, (one harrowing report was of a woman's body pulled from her car, under 150 feet of water), 15 dead out of the 4 million otherwise affected by the loss of power gives one pause to consider that either the whole east coast was unbelievably lucky, or the hurricane wasn't at all what it was played up to be. The most economical damage appears to be in New York, where a sizeable chunk of retail sales were anticipated lost this weekend--more a result of the city shutting down the entire weekend in preparation for the storm, than from the storm itself.
No doubt, much of the hype is generated by the media, which earns its bread on the sensationalism of stories, and which certainly loves natural disasters as backdrops for their "on-scene" reports. Yet, and perhaps as an instance of poetic justice, they were let down by the rather unsensational nature of Irene. According to one report, even CNN's Anderson Cooper, well-known for being the reporter in the thick of events like natural disasters, seemed somewhat let down as he reported from New York. According to Toby Harnden, the U.S. Editor of the Daily Telegraph, "He looked crestfallen fell briefly silent when a weatherwoman told him that the rain was not going to get any worse. 'Wow, because this isn't so bad,' he said. 'It's an annoying rain but it isn't even a sideways rain.'"
Such hype was also, no doubt, played up by state, local and federal politicians, who, of course, would rather be safe than sorry, but also are trying to either boost or protect their image, especially after the latest hit to that image as a result of the national debt "crisis". Moreover, the memory of the Federal Emergency Management Agency's mismanaged response to hurricane Katrina in 2005 still lingers in the minds of many, including those of politicians. No one wants to go through that again.
Such hype was also, no doubt, played up by state, local and federal politicians, who, of course, would rather be safe than sorry, but also are trying to either boost or protect their image, especially after the latest hit to that image as a result of the national debt "crisis". Moreover, the memory of the Federal Emergency Management Agency's mismanaged response to hurricane Katrina in 2005 still lingers in the minds of many, including those of politicians. No one wants to go through that again.
Say what we will about the hype, it is nonetheless a good thing that Irene didn't cause more damage than it did, and for that, we should truly be thankful.
No comments:
Post a Comment